|
Riaz Tayob 9/15/2003
Green Room Meeting 1
A meeting in a "Green Room" (a dirty word for arm
twisting bullying and imperial tactics) between EC, US, China,
Brazil, Malaysia, Kenya, South Africa and Mexico was held.
No one except ministers were allowed by the WTO security in
yet another untransparent process.
The ministers met for 2 hours and it is alleged that Pascal
Lamy (EC) and Robert Zoellick (US) tried to engineer a move
by these countries on the Singapore Issues.
The EC and US stated that these countries must move on the
Singapore issues so that discussions on agriculture could
start later in the day.
India, Malaysia and Kenya left the meeting for a caucus while
the others stayed inside. They were joined a little later
by South Africa and the caucus continued. Together they decided
that they will not move on the Singapore issues unless there
was first a major shift on Agriculture by both the US and
the EC.
Comment: The problem with this is that the imperial countries
(EC and US) have managed to link the new issues with the negotiations
on agriculture. This is also reflected in the draft text that
was unprocedurally and unfairly drafted. It is unacceptable
that these issues be linked for a number of reasons:
1) During th Uruguay Round developing countries made concessions
on GATS and TRIPs to secure a deal on agriculture. So in terms
of the reciprocity of the multilatral trading system they
should not be asked to make concessions on Agriculture. The
EC and US by clever sleight of hand (and by not giving developing
countries the time to seriously read and consider the Uruguay
round agreements have managed to actually increase domestic
support and export credits for agriculture.
2) The Doha Ministerial Declaration does not place the Singapore/New
Issues on the agenda and clearly states that explicit consensus
(meaning all WTO members must agree) is required before negotiations
begin.
3) The new issues discussions were facilitated by Canada
whose representative has been accused of chauvinism and being
against developing countries. Accordinly he is an unsuitable
candidate for ANY work on a multilateral level.
|